![]() ![]() It requires no special equipment on the aircraft, and no identification or location information needs to be broadcast, internet or otherwise. This would also be done with equipment on the aircraft.įAA-Recognized Identification Areas: This is the provision that R/C pilots would have to abide by. In this scenario, the aircraft would transmit its information through the internet alone - no broadcasting required. Limited Remote ID: This option would require the aircraft to fly no more than 400 feet from the controller and within line of sight of the operator. It would require the aircraft broadcast it’s identification and location information directly from the aircraft, while also sending that information to a Remote ID service provider through an internet connection, using equipment on the the aircraft itself. Standard Remote ID: This is the primary method the FAA would prefer aircraft use. The FAA outlined three options to comply with this requirement: ![]() This will more easily allow situational awareness for both unmanned and manned aircraft alike. Primarily, the goal is to get as many aircraft as possible equipped with some sort of “Remote ID” technology that will allow the aircraft’s position to be seen by others, including those on the ground and in the air. I don’t think it’s an overstatement to say that, if enacted, this policy will result in a mass exodus of R/C pilots from the hobby, and while it will provide an initial (and much needed) boost to AMA-chartered clubs, it’s obvious that the FAA hopes to see even AMA clubs dwindle and die in the long run.įirst, a run down of the proposed rule. This covers R/C airplanes, drones, and helicopters. On December 26th, the FAA sent out its new proposed rule regarding the use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) by civilian pilots. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |